What is a food allergy challenge test

Food Allergy Testing


What do the test results mean?

If the skin or blood test is negative for a food, then your kid probably does not own an allergy to that food.

If the skin test is positive for a certain food, it may mean your kid is allergic to that food. Sometimes the test can be positive even if your kid is not allergic to the food. The positive test result can be incorrect sometimes because:

  1. Your kid can sometimes continue to own a positive test result for numerous years to a food allergy he or she has outgrown.
  2. Your kid is allergic to a diverse food or nonfood that has some components similar to the food he or she was tested for.

    For example your kid might own a positive test for soy if she has a peanut allergy, or a positive test to wheat, if he has a grass pollen allergy.

Test results are only one part of a larger picture that takes into account your child’s medical history and current health. Sometimes a test needs to be repeated to check the first result. Talk to your healthcare provider about your child’s result and enquire questions.

For more information contact:

Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network (FAAN)

Web Site:

The American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology

Web Site:

Developed by RelayHealth.
Pediatric Advisor published by RelayHealth.
Last modified:
Last reviewed:
This content is reviewed periodically and is subject to change as new health information becomes available.

The information is intended to inform and educate and is not a replacement for medical evaluation, advice, diagnosis or treatment by a healthcare professional.
© RelayHealth and/or its affiliates. Every rights reserved.

Welcome to Wellness Lies, our list of the most pervasive misfires in the effort to feel and glance better. We asked the experts and consulted the best science on every the questions you own about each of these wellness fads.

Read the whole list and share with your most misinformed friends and family members.

I promised myself that on the day I wrote this article, I would eat oatmeal for breakfast with peanut and almond butter on top. Those are three foods that an at-home food intolerance test, Pinnertest, suggested I give up almost a year ago, and I’ve been struggling since to reintroduce them into my diet.

I first encountered Pinnertest while scrolling through Instagram. It was being marketed by health and wellness influencers, and numerous celebrities own lent their faces and accounts to the test as well. Other food intolerance tests own recently popped up too; one called Everlywell started showing up in my feed alongside perfectly plated food, manicured nails, and an assurance that a simple blood prick could easily tell you what foods were causing your stomach upset.

Yet scientists and allergists tell that the science behind these tests is shaky at best, and completely misleading at worst. While they’re being promoted through attractive filters online, the people who take them are left with endless lists of foods that they’re supposed to eliminate and confusion about what a food intolerance really is. Take me, for instance: I don’t ponder I’m actually intolerant to the foods from my results.

But getting test results that showed that my immune system had made an antibody called Immunoglobulin G, or IgG, in response to peanuts, oats, almonds, and egg whites, it was hard not to feel wary of those foods.

And so, I’m ashamed to tell, I still didn’t eat oatmeal for breakfast.

This is the true harm of these tests: not just that they could be incorrect, or own kept me from PB&Js for a whole year, but that they can be a sand trap for anyone with disordered thoughts and fears around eating.

Am I ever going to eat an oatmeal raisin cookie again?

A food intolerance is not the same thing as a food allergy. Allergies are a specific adverse reaction to a substance, which can be food, medicine, or venom, and they can be life threatening (think: kid you went to elementary school with who always carried an Epi-pen). If you’re genetically predisposed to be allergic to a food, when you encounter it, your immune system produces Immunoglobulin E, or IgE, antibodies, which travel to cells that release chemicals that cause the allergic reaction: itchiness or tightness in the throat, nose, mouth and airways.

In severe cases, anaphylaxis can happen.

Food intolerances own a murkier definition. They’re described by the American Academy of Allergy Asthma and Immunology as “when a person has difficulty digesting a specific food.” The symptoms are mostly stomach-related, love intestinal gas, abdominal pain or diarrhea. But migraines, fatigue, eczema, and head fog own also been attributed to food intolerances. A basic way the AAAAI differentiates the two is that food intolerances involve the digestive system and food allergies involve the immune system. But wait, food intolerance tests, love Pinnertest and Everlywell, also glance for an antibody: IgG.

It’s been a endless debate as to whether IgG antibodies, a diverse helpful antibody than IgE, own anything to do with predicting food intolerances.

I asked Robert Hamilton, a professor of medicine at Johns Hopkins University who runs a diagnostic allergy laboratory, what the deal was. He didn’t his mince words: “There is no firm, peer reviewed data that verifies that IgG antibody is diagnostically useful,” he tells me. “This type of food sensitivity test is essentially a bogus test.” He says that the presence of IgG antibodies for a certain food in my blood could merely mean I was recently exposed to it, not that I was sensitive in any way.

That rang true for me: A couple weeks ago, I also took an Everlywell test to compare the results to my Pinnertest. A whole bunch of new foods had popped up, including walnuts, sunflower seeds, and cashews.

Those were foods I only started to eat a lot of after my Pinnertest eliminations (walnuts and sunflower seeds in put of almonds and peanuts). The fact that I had IgG antibodies in my blood could be telling me what I already know: I’m eating these foods regularly.

“But it doesn’t mean that you are sensitive or intolerant to those,” Hamilton says. “And it certainly doesn’t mean you should avoid exposure to them, or avoid eating them. This type of test is basically totally inappropriate.

And how it can get on the market, and be sold, with these claims, is extremely disturbing.”

All the food intolerance tests are considered “laboratory-developed tests, and are therefore not regulated by the Food and Drug istration,” StatNews recently reported. And despite who’s vetting them, they’re selling well. Everlywell recently received a one million dollar investment from Shark Tank, and raked in $6 million in sales final year, Stat wrote. Everlywell also sells other at-home medical tests, but their food intolerance test is the best-seller. It costs $ and Pinnertest costs $; Everlywell screens for 96 common foods, while Pinnertest screens for If you read the fine print, both tests tell that their results are just meant to be a «guide» for elimination, not a definitive diagnosis.

But even that, Hamilton says, reaches beyond what IgG antibodies can tell us.

“We’ve been fighting this for numerous years,» Hamilton says. «I’m a firm believer in the lack of utility of this helpful of antibody test in predicting or identifying food intolerance. Every of our professional allergy societies, immunology societies, back that statement up with policies that they have.” AAAAI, which is the professional society in the United States, has a position statement on this issue, as do the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and the European Academy: Every tell that IgG tests should not be used to diagnose food intolerance.

When I contacted Everlywell to enquire about the validity of their test, a spokesperson replied saying the following: “We believe there is a divergence of views regarding IgG tests.

We recognize that the AAAAI does not support any form of food sensitivity testing (which is not just limited to IgG testing), but they are not the entire ‘medical community,’ and AAAAI does not speak for every health care providers.»

Hamilton thinks that food intolerances can be extremely genuine. But to identify those intolerances, you need to do a excellent old-fashioned elimination diet, which involves taking out the top food allergens, keeping a food diary, and consulting with an allergist or dietician. You could also do blind placebo exposures on yourself, with potentially troubling food. “Those and elimination diets are extremely tough to do and tough to interpret,” Hamilton says.

“And for that reason, a lot of people fail at those types of tests and they desire a quick and dirty way of assessing what they should avoid.”

At the root of an elimination diet there is a hope that some larger problem will be magically resolved.

What is a food allergy challenge test

I was beautiful vulnerable when I first saw Pinnertest as I was scrolling through Instagram. I had been traveling a lot for work, was finally settling back into my apartment and city, and my generally manageable OCD came out to frolic in a large way.

I own health and contamination phobias and obsessions, so the thought of getting a list of the foods that were contaminating me, to resolve vague (and probable anxiety-related) physical symptoms was appealing. I did research IgG antibodies before I ordered the test, and came across every the research saying it wasn’t legit. Here’s the thing: I didn’t care.

The problem with these tests isn’t that the truth is being hidden from consumers, it’s that: if you are struggling with any helpful of disordered eating or thinking patterns, you will latch onto them despite what the evidence says.

When I joined the Everlywell group, I saw a lot of posts from people who were confused at how some of their most frequently eaten foods showed up, and stressed at how to eliminate sometimes five to ten or more foods at the same time. I won’t quote any of their comments here because it’s a private group, but I saw a lot of myself in their worries.

Because of my OCD, I also love rules, and once I implement a law, it’s extremely hard for me to break it, as it becomes a ritual. As final year went on, and I got my anxiety under control again, I still couldn’t manage to eat those foods.

My specific mental trappings might be a bit unique, but Hamilton says that he’s heard of numerous people using the elimination foods as an excuse to restrict more, and lose more weight.

People with anorexia or orthorexia—the obsession with healthy and clean eating—are especially at risk.

On the group, you can also discover people who said they their symptoms–wide ranging in nature–improved as the result of cutting out foods. Everlywell directed me to a webpage filled with testimonials from people who eliminated foods and ended up feeling better.

Maybe some people happened upon the food they really did own an intolerance to; it’s not impossible. But for others, it could every be wrapped up in how much influence our minds, expectations, and fears own on our eating. The same reasons I couldn’t bring myself to eat oatmeal.

I got in touch with Emeran Mayer, who is the director of the Oppenheimer Middle for Neurobiology of Stress Ingestive Behavior and Obesity Program at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA.

What is a food allergy challenge test

He treats patients with GI issues, love irritable bowel syndrome and disorder, but tells me that most of his patients who own encountered these intolerance tests own what’s called «functional GI disorder»—when a person has continuing symptoms but no definitive diagnosis.

He thinks everyone is vulnerable to the underlying mental booby traps these tests put out there: The thought that there are foods, healthy foods, that are secretly making you ill. The anxiety such a thing creates is not benign, he says. While a placebo effect could make some people get better from cutting out pineapple or green peas, such an effect could just as easily be contributing to upset stomachs, causing the extremely symptoms people are trying to avoid.

Mayer also studies the interaction of the gut and the brain; he recently wrote a book called The Mind-Gut Connection.

He tells me that when people own extreme anxiety, the brain generates stress signals that travel to the gastrointestinal tract through the autonomic nervous system and the vagus nerve. This stress can change a lot of aspects of the gut and digestion. It can alter transit time of food through the digestive system, it can change blood flow or immune responses, it can change secretion of mucus, and every of those changes can then affect the bacteria that live in your gut, or your microbiome.

“If you’re walking around being stressed around your food and being constantly worried, that is becoming helpful of a self-fulfilling prophecy from the nocebo effect,» he says. (The nocebo effect is when the suggestion of negative effects might actually bring about those negative effects.) «But also it changes your gut-environment context in a way that can compromise the proper digestion of food. There’s a really shut link between anxieties, food-related stress, and gut dysfunction.”

Whenever I sat below to attempt to reintroduce a food from my elimination list, I would wait nervously for the backlash. I began to pay way too much attention to my stomach, and how it was feeling.

That negative expectation, according to Mayer, could make me feel ill regardless of what the food was actually doing to me.

Mayer puts his patients with digestive issues on a classic elimination diet: He tells them to hold a food diary, and record below if a symptom is noticeable enough to disrupt them from their day. If they desire to, they can attempt eliminating it for a week. If that makes them feel better, they can select to stay away, or just eat it in low amounts.

This may not sound too diverse from what Pinnertest and Everlywell propose, but Mayer says being in control makes every the difference.

“It has the benefit that it empowers the patient,” he says. “It’s the patient who makes the determination, it’s not some lab telling them what they can’t eat. And most of them will finish up with a relatively little list. Often it’s only one item.”

If I take a step back, I can see how weird it is that food intolerance tests are «trendy.» What’s cool about a medical test?

Lisa Hayim is a clinically trained registered dietician who got her master’s degree from Columbia University in nutrition, exercise, and physiology.

She also happens to own a foothold in the Instagram “wellness” world, with more than 50, followers on her account, @thewellnecessities. (She’s never posted about a food intolerance test.) Hayim says that numerous of us can be unconsciously seeking out reasons to not eat certain foods, because of an unhealthy mental relationship with food. If a new client comes to see Hayim after having taken one of these tests, “we sort of own to take a large step backwards.” She says she’ll take it into consideration, but love Mayer and Hamilton, would rather rely on a more general elimination diet, if she thinks it’s needed.

She tells me that even if the results of at-home food intolerance tests were one day valid, people would still be left with the aftermath: “What do I do next?” she says.

“And that is the problem. That’s what can cause this form of disordered eating. Not necessarily related to weight acquire, but a disordered relationship to being hyper-healthy.”

Hayim says she sees this a lot and in response, she co-founded a course called Peaceful The Noise, hosted with Dr. Naomi Arbit, that brings people together to talk about food fears, intuitive and mindful eating, and food liberty. A lot of people, especially those immersed in the wellness world, can be stuck in similar mindsets that food intolerance tests create: That foods are either “good” or “bad.”

Hayim says that an understated risk of these tests is that it can affect your nutritional health as well.

“You basically finish up sticking to the foods that are so safe but aren’t necessarily bringing in every the significant nutrients and vitamins into your body,» she says.

If I ended up quitting every the foods that Everlywell told me to, that’s exactly what I’d do. Instead of eating curiously and with pleasure, or trying foods of every types, I’d be bogged below by rules and finish up settling for what I knew (or thought I knew) was safe.

Hayim doesn’t ponder that bloggers or influencers need to necessarily stop sharing their experiences with these tests or diets, but they do need to be more transparent about where they’re coming from. “They’re allowed to share their tale and their experience and I ponder that’s really insightful,” she says. “What worked for somebody might work for another person. But it also might not. So I really appreciate disclosures. Numerous of these tests own not been formally validated and just because they are testing your blood, which seems so cellular and fact-based, doesn’t mean that they are the end-all.”

I’m a little more cynical; I own yet to see an Instagram account say: I took this test and decided not to eliminate these foods.

Nor own I seen one that questioned the science behind IgG prediction of food intolerance. And that’s probably because influencers are being paid to promote these products.

Instagram aside, if you’ve found yourself unwittingly placing foods in the “bad” category, for whatever reason, Hayim has some tips for bringing them back into your life. “Give yourself an chance to do what you ponder is so bad,” she says. “That’s really significant. I even do that for myself.

There are foods that used to be on my ‘bad’ list and I will eat one or two of them at dinner. I might tell to myself, ‘Lisa, let’s see how mentally strong you are. Let’s see if you can tackle this food.’ And I’ll own one or two and that’s the finish of it.»

Remember: this doesn’t apply for true food allergies, or foods that through a proper elimination diet you’ve decided don’t sit correct with you. But if you’re love me, and you’ve eliminated a whole bunch of foods for no valid medical reason, it’s excellent to challenge ourselves and bring them back, without fear.

Hayim suggests starting slow, and if you’re feeling nervous, to attempt a food again at home, by yourself; not out at a crowded restaurant with your in-laws.

Armed with her advice, I’m going to attempt again. I am proud that I when I got my Everlywell results I felt I had the power to ignore them; I even ate a handful of walnuts as I was reading it. Maybe combining three of my banned foods into one super-triggering oatmeal breakfast wasn’t the best way to start, but I ponder there’s a spoonful of almond butter straight from the jar in my extremely near future.

Read This Next: People Obsessed With Wellness Can’t Accept That We’re Every Going to Die

C.

Spence, On the psychological impact of food colour, Flavour, vol.4, pp,

P. Amchova, H. Kotolova, and J. Ruda-kucerova, Health safety issues of synthetic food colorants, Regul Toxicol Pharmacol, vol, pp,

G. Feketea and S. Tsabouri, Common food colorants and allergic reactions in children: myth or reality?, Food Chem, vol, pp,

I. Huybrechts, I. Sioen, P. Boon, D. Neve, M. Amiano et al., Long-term dietary exposure to diverse food colours in young children living in diverse European countries, EFSA, vol.7, pp,

G. Fuglsang, C. Madsen, S. Halken, M. Jorgensen, P. A. Ostergaard et al., Adverse reactions to food additives in children with atopic symptoms, Allergy, vol, pp,

C.

C. Roehr, G. Edenharter, S. Reimann, I. Ehlers, M. Worm et al., Food allergy and non-allergic food hypersensitivity in children and adolescents, Clin Exp Allergy, vol, pp,

M. Kägi, B. Wüthrich, and S. Johansson, Campari-Orange anaphylaxis due to carmine allergy, Lancet, vol, pp,

B. Wüthrich, M. K. Kägi, and W. Stücker, Anaphylactic reactions to ingested carmine (E), Allergy, vol, pp,

E. Beaudouin, G. Kanny, H. Lambert, S. Fremont, and D. Moneret-vautrin, Food anaphylaxis following ingestion of carmine, Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol, vol, pp,

J.

L. Baldwin, A. H. Chou, and W. R. Solomon, Popsicle-induced anaphylaxis due to carmine dye allergy, Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol, vol, pp,

J. Liippo and K. Lammintausta, Allergy to carmine red (E) is not dependent on concurrent mite allergy, Int Arch Allergy Immunol, vol, pp,

J. Liippo and K. Lammintausta, An oral challenge test with carmine red (E) in skin prick test positive patients, Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol, vol, pp,

N. B. Ramsey, K. Tuano, C. M. Davis, K. Dillard, and C. Hanson, Annatto seed hypersensitivity in a pediatric patient, Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol, vol, pp,

I.

A. Myles and D. Beakes, An allergy to goldfish? Highlighting the labeling laws for food additives, WAO J, vol.2, pp,

L. Gimenez and M. Zacharisen, Severe pepper allergy in a young kid, WMJ, vol, p,

L. Airaksinen, R. Riekki, A. Vuokko, and A. Puustinen, Paprika rhinoconjunctivitis case reveals new occupational Capsicum allergens, Am J Ind Med, vol, pp,

C. Lambrecht and A. Goossens, Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by capsicum, Contact Dermatitis, vol, pp,

A. Fischer-louise and T. Agner, Curcumin allergy in relation to yellow chlorhexidine solution used for skin disinfection prior to surgery, Contact Dermatitis, vol, pp,

M.

Hata, E. Sasaki, M. Ota, K. Fujimoto, J. Yajima et al., Allergic contact dermatitis from curcumin (turmeric)?, Contact Dermatitis, vol, pp,

C. L. Goh and S.

What is a food allergy challenge test

K. Ng, Allergic contact dermatitis to Curcuma longa (turmeric), Contact Dermatitis, vol, p,

L. Lopez-villafuerte and K. Clores, Contact dermatitis caused by turmeric in a massage oil, Contact Dermatitis, vol, pp,

A. Fiocchi, L. Dahdah, A. Martelli, O. Mazzina, G. Manzotti et al., Spice allergies in children, Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol, vol, pp,

B. Wüthrich, P. Schmid-grendelmeyer, and M. Lundberg, Anaphylaxis to saffron, Allergy, vol, pp,

D. A. Moneret-vautrin, M. Morisset, P. Lemerdy, A. Croizier, and G. Kanny, Food allergy and IgE sensitization caused by spices: CICBAA data (based on cases of food allergy), Allerg Immunol (Paris), vol, pp,

K.

Masuda, N. Katoh, H. Mizutani, and S. Kishimoto, Anaphylaxis to vitamin B2 added to an energy drink, Clin Exp Dermatol, vol, pp,

L. Ou, M. Kuo, and J. Huang, Anaphylaxis to riboflavin (vitamin B2), Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol, vol, pp,

M. Böhm, B. Bunselmeyer, T. A. Luger, and R. Brehler, Food intolerance due to wine gums: identification of copper chlorophyll (E) as a possible pseudoallergen, J Allergy Clin Immunol, vol, pp,

T. Bourrier, Intolérances et allergies aux colorants et additifs, Rev Fr Allergol, vol, pp,

J. T. Nigg, K. Lewis, T. Edinger, and M. Falk, Meta-Analysis of attentiondeficit/hyperactivity disorder or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms, restriction diet, and synthetic food color additives, J Am Acad Kid Adolesc Psychiatry, vol, pp,

G.

A. Settipane, The restaurant syndromes, N Engl Reg Allergy Proc, vol.8, pp,

M. O. Elhkim, F. Héraud, N. Bemrah, F. Gauchard, T. Lorino et al., New considerations regarding the risk assessment on Tartrazine, Regul Toxicol Pharmacol, vol, pp,

J. L. Beausoleil, J. Fiedler, and J. M. Spergel, Food Intolerance and childhood asthma: what is the link?, Paediatr Drugs, vol.9, pp,

E. Nettis, M. C. Colanardi, A. Ferrannini, and A. Tursi, Suspected tartrazineinduced acute urticaria/angioedema is only rarely reproducible by oral rechallenge, Clin Exp Allergy, vol, pp,

D.

D. Stevenson, R. Simon, W. R. Lumry, and D. A. Mathison, Adverse reactions to tartrazine, J Allergy Clin Immunol, vol, pp,

I. Reese, T. Zuberbier, B. Bunselmeyer, S. Erdmann, M. Henzgen et al., Diagnostic approach for suspected pseudoallergic reaction to food ingredients, J Dtsch Dermatol Ges, vol.7, pp,

O. Michel, N. Naeije, M. Bracamonte, J. Duchateau, and R. Sergysels, Decreased sensitivity to tartrazine after aspirin desensitization in an asthmatic patient intolerant to both aspirin and tartrazine, Ann Allergy, vol, pp,

C.

Leleu, C. Boulitrop, B. Bel, G. Jeudy, P. Vabres et al., Quinoline yellow dye-induced fixed food-and-drug eruption, Contact Dermatitis, vol, pp,

J. Millar, Excipient E a cause for complaint?, Br J Gen Pr, vol, p,

C. Deluze and P. Beaumont, Allergie alimentaire à la graine d’amarante, Rev Fr Allergol, vol, pp,

M. Ibero, J. L. Eseverri, C. Barroso, and J. Botey, Dyes, preservatives and salicylates in the induction of food intolerance and/or hypersensitivity in children, Allergol Immunopathol (Madr), vol, pp,

B.

Singh, A. Sharma, and A. Garg, Herbal oral gel induced contact stomatitis along with desquamative gingivitis due to a coloring agent, J Indian Soc Periodontol, vol, pp,

S. Mäkinen-kiljunen and T. Haahtela, Eight years of severe allergic reactions in Finland, WAO J, vol.1, pp,

A. Hamelin, S. Barete, C. Pecquet, N. Abuaf, J. E. Autegarden et al., Rev Fr Allergol, vol, p,

K. Nandate and B. B. Voelzke, Severe hypotension, hypoxia, and subcutaneous erythema induced by indigo carmine istration during open prostatectomy, Case Rep Urol, vol, pp,

J. P. Rajan, R. A. Simon, and J. V. Bosso, Prevalence of sensitivity to food and drug additives in patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria, J Allergy Clin Immunol Pr, vol.2, pp,

F.

Aguilar, H. Autrup, S. Barlow, L. Castle, R. Crebelli et al., Scientific opinion of the panel on food additives, flavourings, processing aids and food contact materials (AFC) on a request from the Commission on the results of the study by McCann et al. () on the effect of some colours and sodium benzoate on children’s behaviour, EFSA, vol, pp,

N. Wilson and A. Scott, A double-blind assessment of additive intolerance in children using a 12 day challenge period at home, Clin Exp Allergy, vol, pp,

M. L. Pacor, D. Lorenzo, G. Martinelli, N.

Mansueto, P. Rini et al., Monosodium benzoate hypersensitivity in subjects with persistent rhinitis, Allergy, vol, pp,

R. Asero, Sodium benzoate-induced pruritus, Allergy, vol, pp,

I. Ehlers, B. Niggermann, C. Binder, and T. Zuberbier, Role of nonallergic hypersensitivity reactions in children with chronic urticaria, Allergy, vol, pp,

The term cutaneous adverse food reaction (food allergy) is often used to define the food-triggered clinical syndrome of allergic dermatitis, gastrointestinal (GI) signs or both.

Food allergies may be responsible for chronic skin and ear disease in both cats and dogs.

Potential allergens can include protein sources (e.g. chicken, turkey, beef, lamb, soy, dairy, eggs) or carbohydrate sources (e.g. corn, rice, barley, wheat). Some pets can own more than one food allergy. Food allergies often start in pets younger than 1 or older than 7 years of age, but they can be acquired at any time, even when a pet has been eating the same food for months to years.

What does food allergy glance like?

Food-allergic animals generally own nonseasonal pruritus because the source of the problem does not change with the weather or seasons.

About 20% of food-allergic pets also own GI signs such as flatulence, vomiting, diarrhea, noisy intestinal sounds, or defecating more than four to five times a day. Dogs may scratch their face, ears, feet, groin or anal area or develop recurrent skin or ear infections (Figure 1). A frequent presentation includes licking at the anal area in addition to problems with the ears-this is why the condition is often referred to as one that affects “ears and rears.” Cats may overgroom certain areas of the body or the whole body, exhibit intense itching at the face or neck, or develop ear infections.

Figure 1.

Skin infections in a food-allergic cat (top) and dog (bottom). Images courtesy of Judy Seltzer, BVetMed, MRCVS, DACVDThe onset of food allergy can be slow and gradual or more sudden. Clinical signs often continue to progress as endless as the offending allergen is fed. It can take several weeks to months for clinical signs to resolve once the allergenic agent is removed from the animal's diet. Up to 30% of food-allergic pets may own other allergies, such as a flea allergy dermatitis or atopy (environmental allergies). About 50% of food-allergic dogs will not reply favorably to steroids.

Diagnosis and treatment of food allergy

The only precise way to diagnose an animal with a food allergy is to remove all of the currently fed foods and start a strict elimination diet trial.

Available blood and saliva tests are not dependable for diagnosing food allergies in cats and dogs, and skin testing has also been found to be ineffective.

An elimination diet consists of a prescribed home-cooked or prescription therapeutic diet that contains a unique protein and carbohydrate source to which the animal has not previously been exposed. The most common novel protein diets include rabbit and potato, venison and potato, and kangaroo and oats.

Numerous fish and lamb diets are no longer considered novel as these ingredients are more commonly used in over-the-counter (OTC) diets.

Another option is to use a hydrolyzed (low-molecular-weight) diet, also available by prescription. These diets are composed of common ingredients (such as chicken and soy) that own been molecularly altered to be under the allergenic threshold. This alteration prevents the animal's immune system from recognizing the food.

Oh, no, you didn't

Simply changing from one brand of pet food to another does not constitute an allergy diet trial.

Several OTC “allergy” or “limited-ingredient” diets are now available in pet stores and online, but they are not always as pure as they claim to be or may own hidden ingredients.

Some pets with food allergies will not get better on a pet store diet. A little percentage of truly food-allergic animals remain undiagnosed with commercially prepared diets and need to be trialed with a home-cooked diet.

Home-cooked diets. Examples of proteins used in home-cooked diets are tilapia, salmon, duck, rabbit, pork or pinto beans, generally mixed with sweet potatoes, oats, quinoa or barley. A home-cooked diet should be nutritionally balanced. Therefore, recommend that the client consult with a board-certified nutritionist before feeding a home-cooked diet.

Nutritionists are also extremely helpful when an animal has a concurrent disease, such as urinary tract infection, history of bladder stones or irritable bowel disease, and they can work with the primary veterinarian or dermatologist to formulate an appropriate diet. Websites including and own also been helpful in formulating home-cooked diets for a trial.

Therapeutic diets. Veterinary dermatologists often prescribe therapeutic diets from Royal Canin, Hill's and Purina for use in elimination trials. In addition, Rayne Clinical Nutrition makes rabbit, kangaroo and pork diets for dogs and cats that are less processed than dry kibble or canned foods.

Selecting a diet will depend on your patient's diet history. Furthermore, some cats and dogs will require a wet food to assist ister medications, and some owners are adamant about having treats to feed their pet. Knowing the needs of your patient and client will assist in choosing the most appropriate diet for your patient.

Did we mention elimination diet trials are strict?

Emphasizing to clients that absolutely no other food products or treats should be given during an elimination diet trial is imperative.

The pet should be allowed to consume only the prescribed diet, associated treats and water. Pets in an elimination trial cannot have:

Table food

Rawhides, pig ears, bones or other chew toys made with animal products

Supplemental fatty acids

Parasite preventives, medications or toothpastes with added flavor

Treats used to ister medications (e.g. peanut butter, cream cheese, lunch meat, pill pockets).

Regardless of which elimination diet is selected, it should be introduced gradually over a five- to seven-day period.

This is extremely significant as some animals may develop GI problems if their diet is changed suddenly. Most pets adapt to the new diet well, but some need time to adjust. If the pet doesn't adjust to the new diet within a week or two or refuses multiple therapeutic diets, a home-cooked diet can be formulated with the assist of a veterinary nutritionist. To formulate the best possible plan for your patient, it is also significant to take into consideration challenges such as households with multiple pets or little children.

The elimination trial should continue for at least eight to 12 weeks and a minimum of one month beyond resolution of a skin infection.

The pet should be rechecked frequently to assess the progress and results of the diet trial. Rechecks may be more frequent if the pet is being treated for an athletic infection.

If the pet has a food allergy, we expect to see at least a 50% reduction in licking, scratching, chewing or other dermatologic signs. This may happen within the first four weeks for some animals; in others the response may take up to 12 weeks. Cats may need to be on the elimination diet for three to four months before a food allergy is confirmed.

The diet challenge

To prove that a food allergy is responsible for a pet's condition, a diet challenge is typically performed.

This involves reintroducing the original diet, or ingredients from the original diet, to see if the pet has any reaction. In the food-allergic pet, clinical signs will generally worsen within hours to two weeks. If an adverse reaction occurs, resume the elimination diet exclusively. Once the flare-up is resolved, reintroduce individual ingredients from the previous diet one at a time to identify the specific cause.

Beyond proving the food allergy diagnosis precise, a food challenge helps to determine which specific foods or treats should be avoided and to identify an OTC diet that the pet can tolerate.

If we can determine the ingredient causing the problem, we can manage the condition by eliminating the offending food(s) from the pet's diet for life.

Keep in mind, however, that this may not always be possible. Some patients may need to remain on a therapeutic or home-cooked diet for life. Feeding a therapeutic diet long-term will not harm a pet because these diets are well balanced. Therapeutic diets tend to be more expensive than OTC diets, however, and numerous owners prefer to feed a commercial diet.

Prognosis

As with other types of allergies, there is no cure for food allergy.

What's more, animals can develop new food allergies over time. However, if a food allergy is the sole cause of a pet's skin or ear problems, identifying and eliminating the protein(s) or carbohydrate(s) causing the allergy may significantly increase the pet's quality of life and reduce or prevent skin and ear problems in the future.

As noted earlier, pets with an allergy to food ingredients are at higher risk for developing other allergies such as atopic dermatitis or flea allergy dermatitis.

To hold under an animal's itch threshold, every food-allergic pets should be maintained with strict flea control and monitored for secondary skin infections and itching.

Dr. Judy Seltzer graduated from the Royal Veterinary College in London and completed her residency in dermatology at the University of Florida. She has been working in her home state of New York since , currently at BluePearl Veterinary Partners in New York City. She and her husband own a little girl and four cats and enjoy traveling, drop festivals, winter activities and dining out.

In the ever-expanding search for what ails us, numerous people believe that allergies to foods or environmental compounds are contributing to their health problems.

Food allergies are a complicated topic, though. Food allergy, food sensitivity and food intolerance are not the same and not every allergy tests measure the same reaction. The consumer needs to become educated about allergy testing procedures for the best outcome.

Allergies to common substances are a frequent topic of favorite media (see News articles) and one only has to glance below the aisles at the grocery store to see the impact. Entire product lines now focus on foods free of items that may be related to negative reactions in certain people (e.g., gluten, peanuts, tree nuts, eggs, soy).

Allergy testing has become large trade in the healthcare industry. A plethora of blood tests are now available and don’t even require a doctor visit. Allergy test panels are available at grocery stores and the consumer can get a home test kit for diagnosis. Blood tests can be as much as $ each. The medical landscape regarding allergy testing is not only complicated from a scientific and policy viewpoint, but physicians may not own the most recent information. Own scientific advancements led to amazing new tests to help in the diagnosis of allergies or has commercialization of allergy tests – and the resulting increase in people diagnosed with various allergies – come at a price to our health?

Definitions

Some definitions are required to even start a discussion about food allergies.

  1. Food allergies are defined as an adverse immune response to proteins in food.

    Allergies result because the body produces antibodies to something recognized as an antigen (peanut proteins, for example), and this is generally measured through an immunoglobulin E (IgE) response.

  2. Food allergies are diverse from food intolerance, such as being lactose intolerant which is not an immune-mediated response.
  3. Food sensitivity is a nonspecific medical term that is used in a variety of ways.

    Immunoglobulin G (IgG) is often measured as an indicator of food sensitivity.

Back to Top

Recommendations from the Experts

So, what is a person to do regarding allergy testing? The experts indicate that the best method to diagnose an allergy is to start with a thorough medical history after which an allergist may order a skin prick test based on the results.

What is a food allergy challenge test

Serum IgE tests may also be used to assess the response to specific foods, but not normally on a whole panel of randomly chosen foods. The gold standard continues to be an oral food challenge – a double blind placebo controlled test conducted in the doctor’s office so that treatment for possible anaphalaxis can be provided. See Further Reading for links to the statements by the national allergy associations of the U.S., Canada and Europe against the use of IgG blood testing to diagnose food allergies.

Back to Top

Food Allergy Tests

Skin tests, blood tests, food challenges there are a number of allergy tests out there and not every tests are designed to measure the same thing.

Before considering allergy testing, be certain to become familiar with the methods, pros and cons of each test by reading our Food Allergy Tests explained.

Courtesy of

Back to Top

Further Reading

Allergy Association Statements Regarding Food Allergy Testing
Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Food Allergy in the United States: Summary of the NIAID Sponsored Expert Panel Report. Boyce et al. J. Allergy Clin Immunol, December

CSACI Position statement on the testing of food-specific IgG. Stuart Carr, Edmond Chan, Elana Lavine and William Moote Carr et al.

Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology ,

Testing for IgG4 against foods is not recommended as a diagnostic tool: EAACI Task Force Report. Stapel SO, Asero R, Ballmer-Weber BK, Knol EF, Strobel S, Vieths S, Kleine-Tebbe J; EAACI Task Force. Allergy. Jul;63(7)

Food Allergy Testing Review Articles
Gerez, I.F.A., Shek, L.P.C., Chng, H.H., Lee, B.W. Diagnostic tests for food allergy. Singapore Med ; 51(1) Free full text.

Lock RJ, Unsworth DJ. Food allergy: which tests are worth doing and which are not?

J. Clin Exp Allergy. Oct;40(10) Abstract

Mullin,G.E., Swift,K.M., Lipski, L., Turnbull,L.K., Rampertab, S.D. Testing for Food Reactions: The Excellent, the Bad, and the Ugly Nutrition in Clinical Practice, Vol. 25(2) 2 April Abstract

Siles. R.I., Hsieh, F.H. Allergy blood testing: A practical guide for clinicians. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, Vo. 78(9), Sept. Free full text

Back to Top

News Articles

Here is an article in the LA Times from July 20, that discusses the topic of food allergies.
The Wall Highway Journal published this article on Jan.

26, highlighting the concern about erroneous allergy tests and the impact on childrens health.
This article covers facts and fallacies about food allergies and was published in the Jan.

What is a food allergy challenge test

10, edition of the NY Times.
This March 20, article from NPR covers the topic of various food allergy tests.
Journal of the American Medical Association announced the publication of an article (not available online) of a study by the American Academy of Allergy Asthma and Immunology in their June, issue. The JAMA column supports evidence-based evaluation of food allergies to avoid misdiagnosis and inappropriate management.

Back to Top


Why is it done?

If your kid has a history of allergic symptoms after eating certain foods, your healthcare provider may recommend that your kid own tests to check for food allergies.

This will assist you know which foods your kid should avoid eating to prevent an allergic reaction. A extremely few foods are responsible for most food allergies. The most common foods that cause allergies are milk, soy, eggs, peanuts, tree nuts, fish, shellfish, and wheat.

Your kid may need to be tested for food allergies if your kid has some of the following symptoms shortly after eating:

  1. coughing
  2. wheezing or other breathing trouble
  3. throat tightness
  4. stomach cramps, vomiting or diarrhea
  5. itchiness
  6. hives
  7. swelling of the lips or eyelids
  8. redness of the skin
  9. fainting.

If possible, see your healthcare provider while the allergic reaction is occurring.

This will assist your provider with the diagnosis.


What is food allergy testing?

Food allergy testing is a way to check the body’s reaction to certain foods. One or more of the following tests may be done:

  1. food challenge test
  2. blood test
  3. skin prick test
  4. elimination diet.


How should I prepare my kid for an allergy test?

Your kid may need to avoid taking certain medicines before the tests because they might affect the test result.

For example, your kid may need to stop taking any antihistamines one to several days before the tests. Make certain the healthcare provider knows about any medicines, herbs, or supplements that your kid takes. Your kid should not stop using any regular medicines without first consulting with your healthcare provider.


How are the tests done?

Your healthcare provider or allergist may desire to do one or more of the following tests:

Skin prick tests: A skin prick test is often used to test for food allergies. For this test, a drop of food extract is put on the skin and then the skin is pricked with a little needle through the drop of the food extract.

The test can also be done with a pricking device that has been presoaked in the food extract. Only the top layer of skin is pricked. The test is generally done on the child’s back or arm. The skin test is ready to check in about 15 minutes. If your kid is allergic to one of the foods, a red bump that looks love a mosquito bite will appear at the spot where the food extract was placed.

Intradermal skin test: For this test, a little quantity of allergen is injected under the skin with a syringe.

This test is more sensitive than the skin prick method, and can be used if the skin prick tests are negative.

Skin tests are not extremely painful, but they can be scary to a young kid. Before the test, explain to your kid what is going to happen to assist calm any fears. For children who own extremely severe allergic reactions or other skin conditions such as eczema, the skin test may cause irritation or even life-threatening reactions. In this case, the RAST Test would be a safe alternative.

Blood test (RAST test): Blood tests are not done as often as skin prick tests, but they can be useful in certain cases.

Blood tests are sometimes done on babies less than 1 year ancient because their skin does not react to the prick test as well as it does for older children. The test measures the quantity of IgE antibody in the blood. The body makes this type of antibody when trying to fight off the allergy-causing substances in food (allergens). A sample of your child’s blood is sent to a lab for testing. The test results show whether your child’s body is making antibodies to these foods and thus whether your kid is allergic to these foods.

Food challenge: A food challenge test is considered to be the most dependable way to test for food allergies. The test is generally done in your provider’s office. Sometimes it is done in the hospital. During this test, your kid is given gradually increasing amounts of the food while a healthcare provider watches for symptoms. This test should be done only by a trained professional who is ready to treat your kid in case of a serious reaction. In cases of allergies that cannot be tested using a blood test (such as some gastrointestinal allergies), a food challenge test may be the only excellent way to make a diagnosis.

The food challenge is also excellent way to see if your kid has outgrown an allergy.

Elimination diet: Your healthcare provider may desire your kid to stop eating suspect foods for a week or two and then add the items back into the diet one at a time. This can assist join symptoms to specific foods. During this time, you will need to hold a record of any symptoms your kid has and the foods he eats. If your kid has had a severe reaction to foods, this method cannot be used.


RELATED VIDEO: